Since 25 January 2010, it is possible to carry out all types of mergers without the intervention of an independent expert (i.e. the company’s statutory auditor, or an auditor/external accountant if no statutory auditor has been appointed).
Articles 695 and 708 of the Belgian Companies Code (“BCC”), modified following implementation of the European Directive 2007/63/EC, now provide that no independent expert’s report on the merger proposal is required, if all shareholders (and holders of other securities conferring the right to vote) of each of the companies involved in the merger, have so agreed.
Prior to such modification of the BCC, it was only possible to carry out a so-called “parent-subsidiary merger” without the intervention of an independent expert (i.e. a merger whereby the acquiring company already held all shares of the acquired company).
The report of the management bodies of the companies involved in the merger is however still required (articles 694 and 707). The new European Directive 2009/109/EC provides for the possibility to also abolish the requirement to draw up such report. For the time being however, this Directive has not yet been implemented in the BCC, and it is not yet clear whether the Belgian legislator will seize the opportunity to further reduce the burden of formalities for mergers.
For (partial) demergers, the intervention of an independent expert remains required, more in particular for the drawing up of the report with respect to the contribution in kind (articles 602 and 313 BCC). If all shareholders (and holders of other securities conferring the right to vote) of each of the companies involved in the (partial) demerger so agree, no additional independent expert’s report on the (partial) demerger proposal will be required. This was however already the case prior to the recent modification of the BCC.
Karin Winters, Director Corporate & Commercial Law
Bart Vanstaen, Senior Legal Consultant