<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Transactions Blog &#187; due diligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions/tag/due-diligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions</link>
	<description>Our experts'comments on Mergers and Acquisitions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:32:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Due diligence decreases fraud liability</title>
		<link>http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions/2010/01/due-diligence-decreases-fraud-liability-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions/2010/01/due-diligence-decreases-fraud-liability-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacqueline Gram</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due diligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently the President of the Brussels Criminal Court judged that the investigation of KB Lux was not performed on valid terms. This decision again raises questions about how to tackle economic crime and how to deal with fraudsters. In a day-to-day business environment we are more inclined to take measures internally, which in light of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions/2010/01/due-diligence-decreases-fraud-liability-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of IFRS 3 Revised on acquisition’s accounting and earnings</title>
		<link>http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions/2009/06/impact-of-ifrs-3-revised-on-acquisition%e2%80%99s-accounting-and-earnings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions/2009/06/impact-of-ifrs-3-revised-on-acquisition%e2%80%99s-accounting-and-earnings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Veronique Gillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due diligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accounting for acquisitions has changed. The International Accounting Standards Board released a revised standard on business combinations in January 2008 (IFRS 3 Revised), accompanied by a revised standard on consolidated financial statements (IAS 27 Revised).
 The new standards are expected to add to earnings volatility, making earnings harder to predict.
 PwC has produced a guide IFRS 3R: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pwcblogs.be/transactions/2009/06/impact-of-ifrs-3-revised-on-acquisition%e2%80%99s-accounting-and-earnings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
