The European Court of Justice (‘ECJ’) ECJ has ruled that the input VAT on the costs of selling shares in a subsidiary may be recoverable on the basis that they are residual, either because the sale is equivalent to a transfer of a going concern (TOGC) or because (if the sale is an exempt supply) the principle of neutrality requires it to be treated as if it were a TOGC.
Whilst the ECJ was unable to determine, on the facts before it, whether input VAT recovery would apply in the specific case, the principles set forward are highly significant because it casts doubt on many tax authorities’ longstanding policy that the input VAT on the costs incurred in disposing of a subsidiary is wholly irrecoverable because the costs are directly attributable to an exempt supply.
Hence, this decision has important implications for any business disposing of shares in a subsidiary to which it has supplied services, whether the disposal is forthcoming or whether it has happened in the past. It also impacts on how corporate groups should structure themselves in order to maximise their VAT recovery position.
Issues to consider include:
-
which disposals fall within the scope of this decision (and which do not);
-
what types of costs are not “incorporated in the cost” of the share disposal such that the input VAT not initially recovered may now be claimed;
-
what effect (if any) does the presence of a VAT group have on the position;
-
how should shares be held in order to maximise the chances of input VAT recovery on a future sale; and
-
what remedies are available to businesses which have wrongly suffered blocked input VAT on share sales?
Businesses potentially affected by this decision, should as a matter of urgency assess:
-
the application of this decision to their particular circumstances;
-
the possibility of recovering input VAT on costs incurred in relation to future share disposals (in accordance with the VAT recovery profile of the business); and
-
the identification of historic disposals on which input VAT recovery may have been wrongly denied and reclaiming it (together with interest).
In the end, this ECJ court case may lead to an unexpected December VAT cost saving.

Recent Comments